|
State: |
KENTUCKY |
|
Agency: |
KENTUCKY TRANSPORTATION CABINET - DISTRICT 3 |
|
Project
and/or Route Name: |
INTERSTATE
65 - TWIN BRIDGES OVER US 68 / KY 80 |
|
Dates: |
1998-1999 |
|
Rural
and/or Urban: |
RURAL
|
|
Length: |
44.54 m (146.1
FEET) - BRIDGE |
|
Type of
Improvement: |
ROADWAY AND
BRIDGE WIDENING / REPLACEMENT |
|
Firm's Project Manager: |
MICHAEL G. BRUCE, P.E. |
|
Firm's Project Engineer: |
THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, P.E. |
|
Firm's Structural Proj. Engr: |
DAVID C. DEPP, P.E. |
|
Project Description: |
|
|
This project, located near Bowling
Green, Kentucky, involved the widening
of Interstate 65 from 4 to 6 lanes, with consideration of a future 8 lane
roadway. JD&Q's section of the project
involved five (5) bridges, including the widening
and replacement of the I-65 Northbound and Southbound bridges over US 68
/ KY 80. After considering several
alternatives, it was decided to replace the existing bridges in order to provide proper superelevation transitions
and uniform structure framing.
The existing twin 2-lane bridges were widened from 12.72m (41.73 ft)
to 19.50m (64.0 ft), and utilized staged
construction to maintain traffic in both directions on the Interstate. The new bridges are 44.54m (146.1 ft) long, including 3-spans with lengths of 12.2-18.3-12.2
meters (40.0-60.0-40.0 feet), and are framed using Type 2 PPC I-beams with a composite concrete deck. The substructures consist of semi-integral end bents (modified
existing end bents) and multi-column piers (modified
existing piers), both founded on steel H-piles driven to rock. Estimated construction cost for both
bridges is $980,000 ($52/sf). Construction is scheduled for 2002. |
|
|
The
Consultant (Johnson, Depp & Quisenberry) was responsible for: |
|
|
1.
Project Coordination
between consultant team 2.
Field Surveys 3.
Roadway and Drainage Design (Preliminary and Final Plans, Specifications and Cost
Estimates.) 4.
Structure Design
(Preliminary and Final Plans, Specifications and Cost Estimates.) |
|
|
The
Sub-Consultant (Florence and Hutcheson Inc.) were responsible for: |
|
|
1.
Geotechnical Data |
|